Technical and social developments, advances have their own laws, but above all there is a mind that directs and directs them. Whatever you put in the center of development in that direction walks. Even the most independent and neutral sciences – or mathematics – are used for what and where it is very important, and it is decisive. If you put science in opposition to religion, you have a preliminary admission that you can break away from religion as you develop science and you will read the scientific developments in the world and try to be a scientist.
The subject that needs to be considered here is to realize the features of science and to give it to the command of humanity. In the last century, there was a contradiction between science and Islam. In contrast, a counter-defense thesis was developed by removing science from religion. According to his defensive thesis, the main thing is the hazır Western Science bugünkü and all that has been done throughout the history of Islam have been accepted as a transitional process which is preparing the ground for today’s Western science. Western science is never questioned. Those who advocate positivist Islam like Fethullah have tried to positivist religion itself. They said, ir The real thing is science., Science is also measured by reason, how-to-do and circumcision cannot interfere in science, the mind decides how to use it. It is as if there is a conflict between mind and nas, and FETO believes that the mind and other Islamic thinkers and scholars advocate irrationality.
The atmosphere created is: atmosfer There is a scholar who is proficient in science, Islam history, world history, and the latest scientific and technical developments. This person has a perspective that understands Islam and interprets it according to this age, but if it develops in line with it, it will make a positive contribution to the country and humanity. Bu
Fethullah is also one who has turned the Islamic science tradition upside down, according to him, science is absolute, religion is obliged to obey him. Explains the basic aspects of religion according to the principles of science and rationality. Positive science is essential, how-and-so-called circumcision-should be evaluated according to the positivist and rational understanding of this age. Makes a rational and positivist comment on even the most informal issues. Even in matters pertaining to the Hereafter, according to the idea of the world he has established, he or her Explains gay subjects in a manner close to rational and materialist interpretations they have taken over from Jewish theology.
It places many rationality and superstition side to side and intertwined, and eventually makes the modern world pass to the understanding of the exploitation system. He uses the same method with Shia. This is appropriate for Western-minded scholars. Connecting Yesterday to Today, Connecting Today to Tomorrow
If we can connect yesterday and today, today and tomorrow, if we can evaluate history and today side by side, maybe we can avoid deviations and herbs.
There are two opposite poles in this regard;
First: Those who are looking for a departure and departure by repeating the past as a chorus, accusing a vocalist of the present and ruling his zakili. Those who behave in such a way are unable to recognize the vitality of Islam. This is synonymous with closing the case-law. The social events are moving and fluid, fixing what is flowing and walking, and freezing life. To understand and explain the religion in this way ends the vitality and vitality of religion.
Second: Without taking into account yesterday, everything is starting today, we are experiencing this day, we are living in this past, disregarding the accumulated ummah experience and scientific tradition. If this continues; and the direction is broken. Without realizing such a mentality, he drags people into a path that is rootless and deranged. This breakthrough is more beneficial to us than our counterparts.
With this logic, it is difficult to maintain the tradition of knowledge, administration, politics, decorum and adap of Islam. If it breaks, it is unclear where the Ummah will stop and whom it will serve, ambiguity, closeness and ambiguity arises, and FETÖ-type structures benefit most.
If there is no balance in these two issues, either a disconnection or a dullness, neither will give good results for the future of the Ummah.
At the same time, FETÖ used two opposing methods to strike the Islamic tradition of knowledge and undermined Islam’s right to speak and alternative in the modern world.
We can look at many issues from this perspective. Deviations from the core of the nation and of the state may be useful to someone else even if it is not Fethullah. We must oppose any idea that interferes with the state-nation fusion, breaks down from the people, and confronts science and religion. We should take an open attitude on this issue, it is not a matter of ambiguous and general terms.